Skip to main content

Gift Planning

Planned Giving

Find out what types of assets make the best planned gifts. Learn about gifts of cash, securities and property.

Bob and Mary Are Giving Smarter and Achieving Their Dreams...Find Out How You Can Too!

Couple posing with two dogs

Bob and Mary first met at Two-Bit Flicks, a 25-cent movie night held on Fridays in Brighton Lecture Hall. When the spring formal hosted by the women's dorm came around, Mary asked Bob to go with her. It was their first "official" date.


The rest, as the saying goes, is history. Or in Bob and Mary's case, it is natural history. That's because Emporia State also introduced them to a lifelong passion for the natural sciences.


Bob and Mary feel Emporia State was the catalyst for the life they've built together. Mary became a science educator for 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th grade students. Bob founded and served as director of the Great Plains Nature Center and became a renowned nature photographer.


Now they want others to have the same opportunity they did. They want to help students come to ESU and discover a passion they can follow for the rest of their lives.


Bob and Mary found a simple and easy way to achieve this dream. When they set up their trust, they named Emporia State as a beneficiary.


What's your dream?


Learn how easy it is to make your dream a reality by naming Emporia State University in your will or trust. Contact Angela Fullen, Director of Planned Giving at the Emporia State University Foundation. She can answer your questions or help you get started. If you have already named Emporia State in your will or trust, let us know. We will make sure your gift does everything you want it to do.


"I would encourage anyone, if they are thinking about doing something like this, to contact the Foundation. For us, it has been a great experience." - Mary Butel


Getting Started is Easy

Not sure how to take the first step? We've got just the thing you need. Download your free Will and Estate Planning Guide. This guide is an easy way to get started on, or update, your estate plan. It will help you explore your options at your own pace. It's free, easy and yours to keep.


Download your copy today or contact Angela Fullen to request a printed copy.



Image of Angela Fullen

Angela Fullen
Director of Planned Giving
Telephone: 620-341-6465
[email protected]

Text Resize
Sunday April 28, 2024

Washington News

Washington Hotline

IRA Required Minimum Distribution Deadline

In IR–2022–217 the Internal Revenue Service reminded taxpayers born in 1950 or earlier of the December 31 deadline for IRA and most other required minimum distributions (RMDs).

Generally, owners of IRAs or other retirement plans must take a required minimum distribution after they reach age 72. The first RMD may be delayed until April 1 of the year after reaching age 72. If the first distribution is delayed, two distributions will be required in that next year. There is an exception for active workers who are not major owners of a business. These individuals may delay their RMDs until retirement. With a traditional IRA or similar retirement plan, the full RMD is taxable income.
  1. Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) — Even if the account owner is still working, a traditional IRA, SEP, SARSEP or SIMPLE IRA account holder must begin taking distributions by age 72. If the account holder reached age 72 in 2022, he or she may elect to delay the first RMD until April 1, 2023, but would be required to take a second RMD by December 31, 2023.
  2. Retirement Plans — Employees who benefit from a 401(k), 403(b) or 457(a) plan are also required to take their first RMD at age 72. The exception is an active worker who is not a 5% owner of the business. Individuals in this category may delay RMDs until retirement.
  3. RMD Calculations — The IRA trustee or a plan administrator is required to report the amount of the RMD to each IRA owner. IRA owners will calculate RMDs with the IRS Uniform Table unless there is a spouse more than 10 years younger. An IRA owner may calculate an RMD for each separate IRA and withdraw the total amount from one of the IRAs, if multiple IRA accounts are owned. However, if an employee has both an IRA and a workplace retirement plan, the distributions must be calculated and taken separately. A failure to take the RMD could subject the employee to a 50% excise tax on the amount on the undistributed amount.
  4. Inherited IRAs — There are two categories for inherited IRAs. A spouse may roll over an IRA into his or her plan and commence distributions at age 72. Under IRS proposed regulations, a non-spouse must start taking distributions from the inherited IRA. Publication 559, Survivors, Executors and Administrators includes guidance on the withdrawal schedule for a non-spouse who inherits an IRA. Most non-spouse IRA beneficiaries must take the taxable distributions within ten years. Some beneficiaries with a disability or chronic illness may still take distributions over their life expectancy.

IRS Requests New Ruling on Syndicated Easement


The IRS has filed a motion with the Tax Court to request a reconsideration of a November 9, 2022 opinion in which the majority of Tax Court judges held that Notice 2017-10, 2017-4 IRB 544 was invalid because the IRS failed to comply with notice and comment procedures required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

The majority of the Tax Court judges refused to accept the IRS position that Congress exempted the IRS from the APA procedures through Section 6707A of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA). The IRS claimed that AJCA provisions show Congress approved of the IRS practice of identifying listed transactions by notice.

However, the Tax Court stated that Section 6707A "offers no express indication from Congress exempting the IRS from the standard notice-and-comment rulemaking of the APA." The Tax Court also cited the Sixth Circuit's reasoning in Mann Construction Inc. v. United States, 27 F.4th 1138 (6th Cir. 2022) that held a 2007 listing notice on cash value life insurance trusts (Notice 2007-83, 2007-45 I.R.B. 960) was invalid because the IRS did not comply with APA notice requirements.

The IRS supplementary brief explains that the Mann decision failed to consider text "evidencing Congress' clear intent that such notices need not follow notice-and-comment procedures and failing to appreciate the existence and implications of the dozens of listed transaction notices that had already been issued without notice-and-comment when the AJCA was enacted."

The IRS supplementary brief indicates that the existence of other provisions in AJCA, that permitted the IRS to identify listed transactions by notice were not considered by the Tax Court. The IRS stated, "The Sixth Circuit in Mann Construction failed to consider the effective date provisions for the AJCA's amendments to Sections 6501 and 6404, both of which are predicated on the validity of the listing notices the IRS had issued before the AJCA's enactment and the regulation that authorizes the identification of listed transactions by notice."

The IRS argues that the failure of the Tax Court judges to consider these points suggest that they should reconsider the case. The IRS notes that it is important to ensure "the record clearly reflects the Court's consideration of the new arguments in Respondent's Supplement given the absence of discussion of those arguments in the Opinion and the brief lapse of time between the filing of Respondent's Supplement and the Court's fully reviewed Opinion."

Editor's Note: The battle between the IRS and promoters of syndicated easements is continuing. It is likely to be the subject of many other Tax Court cases. It appears that the contests are now transitioning from technical issues to valuation disputes.

SECURE 2.0 May Be Included in December 23 Omnibus Bill


House Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Kevin Brady (R–TX) stated to reporters on December 14 that the SECURE 2.0 retirement package is still likely to be included in an omnibus spending bill.

While the larger tax section of an omnibus bill is not likely to pass this month, the retirement package may be included. House Ways and Means Committee Chair Richard Neal (D-MA) indicated that negotiations on the larger tax package were "pretty stubborn" and were not moving forward. However, Brady stated, "My sense is that they are leaving open room for a very narrow, tightly focused tax title, separate from SECURE 2.0." He stated that the negotiations to resolve the differences between the House Securing a Strong Retirement Act of 2022 (H.R. 2954) and the Senate Enhancing American Retirement Now Act (S. 4808) were "within a foot of the end zone." Brady concluded, "Our assumption is that it would move with the omnibus."

On December 14, the House voted 224 to 201 to extend the time to December 23 to pass an omnibus spending package. Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Senate Appropriations Ranking Member Richard Shelby (R-AL) and House Appropriations Chair Rosa DeLauro (D–CT) agreed they have a framework that "should allow us to finish an omnibus appropriations bill by December 23."

The retirement package has had near unanimous support in the House and Senate. While it is quite probable that the broader tax bill will not be included, there still is a reasonable prospect for passage of SECURE 2.0 with the omnibus bill.

Editor's Note: If the SECURE 2.0 Act is included in an omnibus spending bill, it is probable that the one-time $50,000 IRA rollover to a charitable gift annuity, a standard charitable remainder unitrust or a charitable remainder annuity trust will be included. If this expanded IRA charitable rollover is included in the bill, the effective date could be January 1, 2023. If passed, the $50,000 IRA rollover to an immediate charitable gift annuity will be quite popular.

Applicable Federal Rate of 4.6% for January -- Rev. Rul. 2023-1; 2023-2 IRB 1 (15 December 2022)


The IRS has announced the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) for January of 2023. The AFR under Section 7520 for the month of January is 4.6%. The rates for December of 5.2% or November of 4.8% also may be used. The highest AFR is beneficial for charitable deductions of remainder interests. The lowest AFR is best for lead trusts and life estate reserved agreements. With a gift annuity, if the annuitant desires greater tax-free payments the lowest AFR is preferable. During 2023, pooled income funds in existence less than three tax years must use a 2.2% deemed rate of return.


Published December 16, 2022

Previous Articles

Protect Yourself from Phishing Emails

How to Avoid Holiday Scams

Benefit in 2022 With an IRA Charitable Rollover

IRA Required Minimum Distributions by December 31

IRS Promises Full Staff at Taxpayer Assistance Centers

scriptsknown